Remote vs Rippling
Remote
Startups, mid-market and enterprise companies hiring and paying people in other countries
Rippling
Businesses that onboard, pay and manage employees and contractors in one or more countries
2016; San Francisco, US
Remote and Rippling both pay employees and contractors in other countries, with employer of record, global payroll and a US PEO.
Remote runs on entities it owns and publishes a price for each product; Rippling, founded in San Francisco in 2016, combines HR, IT, finance and payroll on one platform and quotes prices on request.
Remote vs Rippling: side by side
“Not published” means the vendor does not state it.
| Remote | Rippling | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Employer of record, global payroll, contractor management, contractor of record and US PEO, run on owned entities and in-house teams | HR, IT, finance and payroll on one platform built on a single source of employee data, with AI across the products |
| Best for | Startups, mid-market and enterprise companies hiring and paying people in other countries | Businesses that onboard, pay and manage employees and contractors in one or more countries |
| Founded and HQ | Not published | 2016; San Francisco, US |
| Ownership and funding | Not published | Raised US$1.8bn from investors including Kleiner Perkins, Founders Fund, Sequoia and Bedrock |
| Customers or users | Not published | 25,000+ businesses |
| Pricing | Employer of record US$699 per employee a month; payroll US$29 per employee; contractor management US$29 per contractor (Plus US$99); contractor of record from US$325; US PEO from US$99 | Not published; custom quote based on the products chosen |
| Deployment and markets | Employer of record in 90+ countries through entities Remote owns; US PEO across the US | Global payroll, employer of record and US PEO; contractor payments in 185+ countries and 50+ currencies; offices on four continents |
Main differences
Remote publishes prices, from US$699 per employee a month for employer of record and US$29 per employee for payroll; Rippling gives a custom quote based on the products chosen.
Remote runs employer of record through entities it owns in 90+ countries; Rippling adds HR, IT and finance products on a single source of employee data.
Remote offers contractor management from US$29 per contractor and contractor of record from US$325; Rippling pays contractors in 185+ countries and 50+ currencies.
Rippling has 25,000+ customers and has raised US$1.8bn; Remote does not publish its customer count or funding.
Which to choose
Choose Remote if
- You want published per-employee prices, or employer of record through entities the provider owns
Choose Rippling if
- You want payroll alongside HR, IT and finance tools on one employee record
Compare further
Common questions
What is the difference between Remote and Rippling?+
Remote provides employer of record, global payroll, contractor management, contractor of record and a US PEO, run on its own entities and in-house teams. Rippling puts HR, IT, finance and payroll on one platform built on a single source of employee data, with global payroll, employer of record and a US PEO.
How much do Remote and Rippling cost?+
Remote charges US$699 per employee a month for employer of record, US$29 per employee for payroll and US$29 per contractor for contractor management, with contractor of record from US$325 and a US PEO from US$99. Rippling does not publish prices and gives a custom quote.
How many countries do Remote and Rippling cover?+
Remote offers employer of record in 90+ countries through entities it owns, and a US PEO across the US. Rippling pays contractors in 185+ countries and 50+ currencies and has offices on four continents.
Part of Accountio’s accounting technology coverage.
